December 28, 2005
Volume 3 Issue 50Previous Issues
IN THIS ISSUE
  • Survey: VitalSmarts.com
  • Q&A: Doing The Right Thing
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Where Can I Learn More?
  • Contact Us
  • SURVEY
    VitalSmarts Web Survey

    We're interested in your opinion about the VitalSmarts Web site. What features or content would you like to see? What do you not like?

    Weigh in by filling out our online survey.

    The survey should take you less than five minutes, and everyone who fills it out will be entered to win the audio versions of both bestselling books, Crucial Conversations and Crucial Confrontations.

    WHERE CAN I LEARN MORE?

    Crucial Conversations
  • 1/24-25  Boston, MA
  • 1/24-25  Atlanta, GA
  • 1/24-25  Portland, OR
  • 2/7-8 Chicago, IL
  • 2/7-8 Phoenix, AZ
  • 2/21-22 Toronto, ON
  • 2/28-3/1 Southern CA
  • 2/28-3/1 New York, NY
    More
    Crucial Confrontations
  • 1/24-25  Irvine, CA
  • 2/7-8  Washington, DC
  • 3/28-29  Chicago, IL
  • 3/28-29  San Diego, CA
    More


    Crucial Conversations
  • 1/11, 1:00-2:15 PM ET  Overview
    Crucial Confrontations
  • 1/19, 1:00-2:15 PM ET   Overview

    Register today by contacting your VitalSmarts representative by calling 1-800-449-5989 or by clicking here.
  • CONTACT US
    Questions, feedback, or information you would like to see? E-mail us at editor@vitalsmarts.com.

    Submit your question online to the authors of Crucial Conversations and Crucial Confrontations.

    Submission Guidelines
    About the Authors
    "Is an intelligent human being likely to be much more than a large-scale manufacturer of misunderstanding?"
    – Philip Roth

    Doing the Right Thing

    About the Author


    Joseph Grenny is coauthor of the New York Times bestseller, Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High.more

    Dear Authors,

    Here's my struggle: I work for a very well respected company that prides itself on doing the right thing, always having integrity, etc. I recently discovered that one of the HR employee conference rooms has a hidden video camera. The vast majority of employees who meet with the HR staff in this room are not aware of this. I find it ironic that the company projects an image of integrity and openness, then equips a room like this without letting anyone know they could be videotaped at any time.

    So, I am wondering, what is this the "right thing" for me to do?

    Signed,
    Webcams@work

    Dear Webcams@work,

    Most companies today have statements of values, ethical conduct, etc. And yet when you survey most employees, they report that these statements carry about as much weight in day-to-day conduct as the ink on the statement itself.

    So I’m glad you asked this question. I'm glad for two reasons: 1) Because it gives us a chance to talk about what truly makes a company ethical; and 2) Because your very question demonstrates that you are willing to be part of the solution in your own company.

    First, let me debunk a myth about ethics. Ethical companies are not created by rolling out compulsory "Ethics Training" so that everyone is aware of the standards expected of them. Everyone does this. And it tends to accomplish little more than reducing the company's liability when an employee sells out. So how, then, do you create a culture that strongly influences people to behave ethically? By creating a culture where people hold crucial confrontations with those who violate standards. Or even better, where people will challenge others when they even begin moving into gray areas.

    By this principle, Enron was not the story of a few bad apples at the top of the pyramid. Enron could not have happened had there not been hundreds and even thousands of "good" people who stood by and said nothing when illegal practices were just beginning. It is at these moments that a company's soul is at risk—not when the later egregious errors emerge. And if the culture is one where no one wants to offend, risk a confrontation, look naive, or seem "holier than thou"—the end result is inevitable. The culture will change—for the worse.

    So, my second point is that the very fact that you are asking how to handle this crucial confrontation gives me hope for the character of your company. If you find a way to tactfully, respectfully, and directly raise the perceived concern, you will provide others with an opportunity to examine the ethics of the situation. If you do it poorly—accusingly or self-righteously—you will likely provoke defensiveness that will shortcut others' reflection on the ethical issue.

    My advice for you as you open this issue is that you a) do it with the right person, and b) do it in the right way.

    First, ensure you are meeting with someone who has influence over HR policy. If you want to have influence, hold the conversation with someone who has influence. And preferably someone who has a reputation for openness—why make your crucial confrontation any harder than it has to be?

    Second, be sure to lead with the facts and not your story. You have drawn some conclusions that may or may not be correct. It is these that you are there to check out and discuss. For example, it may just be a story rather than a fact that:

    • There are, in fact, cameras.
    • The room is used by those who don't know there are cameras.
    • The cameras are functional and videotape those who are unaware of it.
    • The HR staff is intentionally hiding the fact that there are cameras.

    So, as you lay out your concerns, strip out any "hot words" that sound accusatory or self-righteous and simply describe what you think is happening, why you think it could reflect badly on the company, and then invite the other party to confirm or disconfirm your assertions. Be open to other points of view—including other interests that are served by current practices that you do not understand or appreciate at present.

    Finally, make sure they understand not just your content (the issue you want to raise), but also your intent (you care about the company and want to be part of helping it live up to its aspirations).

    Good luck—and thanks for standing up for what your company is capable of becoming.

    Warmly,
    Joseph


    Dear Editor,

    Regarding the letter from Fettered-with-Forgiveness Commands in Vol. 3, issue 46, it occurs to me that the manager quoting forgiveness commands should be reminded that Scripture also teaches "Let your Yes be Yes and your No be No"—i.e., when you say you're going to do something, do it! Your word is supposed to count for something!

    Signed,
    T.G.

    ------------------

    Dear Editor,

    I realize I am responding to an issue from over 3 months ago, but I was wondering whether Joseph Grenny, coauthor of Crucial Conversations and Crucial Confrontations realized that he was contributing to a racist stereotype when he wrote ". . . everywhere from Israeli software companies and Kenyan slums to Malaysian factories and Wall Street investment banks."

    Why is this racist?

    1. The permutation of the negative with Black People. In this example, Africans are associated with slums—not just in the U.S. but even in one of their own countries of origin.
    2. The positive portrayal of the Israelis (software company), Malaysian (factories), and the U.S.—read White Americans (Wall St. investment bankers).

    I mean, why not say Swedish slums, Russian slums, Italian slums, etc. And why not say Ghanaian cities, Angola suburbs, or Nigerian farms?

    Are these things so hard to imagine?

    Thanks,
    G.Kirkland

    ------------------

    Response from Joseph Grenny, coauthor of Crucial Conversations and Crucial Confrontations:

    Glenn,

    Thank you. Thank you for having enough confidence in me/us that you would raise your voice and offer this feedback.

    First of all, you are absolutely right—I picked stereotypical situations that perpetuate stereotypes. I will be more sensitive to that in the future because of your comment.

    Second, I picked them because my experience in these countries/places was in the circumstances I described. I have spent a great deal of time in Nairobi slums helping some incredible people influence positive change. It has been one of the most inspiring and important experiences of my life. So I want you to know that when I say "Kenyan slums" there is a whole set of feelings that goes with it—all of them positive and energizing.

    Thank you for the gift of your feedback.

    Joseph