Influencer LIVE! Coming to Utah November 1st and 2nd

What do you do if you try everything and still can't make it safe? I'm struggling with two different issues:

1. It seems that no matter what I do, I can't make it safe for my life partner. He was raised in a household where anger and aggression were the norm. I try to begin by making it safe and he immediately becomes upset. It seems these techniques lose effectiveness when you confront decades of habit.
   
   
2. I work in a multicultural environment. No matter what I do to make it safe, many individuals from other countries consistently react with behavior that seems to be textbook silence or violence. For example: last month, a staff member screamed at a client in both English and in their native language while they both gestured wildly—a classic violent conversation. But at the end, the customer kissed the staff member on both cheeks and walked away apparently completely satisfied with their dialogue.

So, again, how do I properly apply these techniques when in some cases, they conflict with a lifetime of habit or culture?

Signed,
Culture Clash

To start with, I'll make three comments with the hope that one or two of them might hit close to home.

1. There are very few absolutes when it comes to silence and violence. What one person feels is "violence" could be perfectly respectful and appropriate to another. For a couple of years, I worked with a group of software developers in another culture who solved problems in very energetic and high-volume conversations. People gestured dramatically and even got red-faced as the conversations developed. At the end, they tended to converge on a solution—and in the two years I worked there, I did not discern any damage to relationships as a result of these actions. What was "violence" to me was "dialogue" to them. Now, I must add that during these high-volume conversations there were occasionally lapses into what they would define as violence—when someone was insulting, accusatory, or called others names, etc. These actions did cause problems, shut down the conversation, and inflict wounds that didn't heal. So I would not go so far as to say there are cultures where there is no such thing as violence. I'd simply encourage you to ask yourself whether you are imposing the communication habits you are comfortable with on others—particularly in your workplace.

2. If you're stumped about creating safety, talk about that. In the situation with your life partner, if you've done your best to help him feel safe, and his behavior is still creating problems, then you need to hold a different conversation. Especially since this is someone you have a long and sustained relationship with—a relationship that profoundly affects your quality of life. You need to talk about the pattern of behavior you see consistently when you raise tough topics. But here's a warning: do not talk about this in the moment the behavior's happening. Too many of us store up frustrations only to let them loose at exactly the wrong time. Rather than holding a deliberate and focused conversation about our concerns, we wait for an instance of the behavior, then say, "See, there you go again!" Bad idea.

The better approach is to have a conversation about having the conversation. Let your loved one know, "I love you. I am glad we're together and I want our relationship to last. I have a nagging frustration—which I may be a part of—that I want to talk to you about sometime. It's something I believe we can solve together—but it's important to me that we talk about it well. I don't want you to feel badgered or put down, so I want to be sure we can do it at a time that you won't feel that way."

Now, I don't know that these words are perfect, but can you see what I'm trying to do here? I'm asking him to make a commitment to behave a certain way as a condition for having this conversation. If he agrees to it, then you must hold him accountable. If he begins to flare, you've got to step out of the conversation and respectfully say something like, "Apparently something I'm doing is not working. I want to talk about this in a time and way that will help us both out. Is there something I need to do differently or should we take a bit of a break?"

If after intervening he recommits to control himself, you can proceed. Otherwise, you must—in a non-punishing way—hold your ground to delay the conversation until he can or will. By "non-punishing" I mean you must carefully resist the urge to "stick it to him" by cutting off the conversation—a temptation all of us feel at times. It's a control strategy that can be quite damaging.

3. Be as committed to your quality of life as you are to his. Making it safe for others is a principle that works. But there are some who are either unwilling or unable to change the way they communicate after a lifetime of habit. If you've done all you're capable of to improve the quality of your communication, take responsibility for your own wellbeing. When you've exhausted your options, decide what you really want. Is the relationship more important to you than the sacrifice you're making to maintain it? Or will the inevitable continuation of current behavior cost your quality of life more than you're willing to accept?

Crucial Conversations skills do not guarantee that others will change. They simply increase the likelihood you'll have a positive influence. Ultimately, the only person you can change is yourself. So decide whether you want to change your approach to conversations, change your expectations of others, or change your relationships.

Best wishes,
Joseph

Back to top

RE: "From the Road: Dialogue Stinks" (October 3, 2007)

Dear Steve Willis,

That is an excellent column!

Although I have had some very positive experiences with crucial conversations since your class, I have also had some where I felt that my conversation failed.

After reading your column, maybe it didn't fail. Maybe I gave the other person the safety to say that this wasn't something that interested her. I didn't get what I wanted but her solution is working.

I will keep looking for your advice. Thank you!

Ann F.

------------------

I got the point of Mr. Willis' most recent column (crucial conversations are about dialogue, not a magical persuasion technique). However it seems to me that the column (which I understand might have been heavily edited for the sake of brevity and not diluting the central point) doesn't really show a crucial conversation. I was expecting that after the first five paragraphs we would be reading about how Mr. Willis sought out this individual privately, made it safe, used the "STATE" skills, started exploring, etc.

Instead it seems that this employee was never engaged in dialogue when his view became known.

Again, I know we probably did not hear the whole story but isn't the column as written an example of a victim story where the premises and techniques of Crucial Conversations are the "victim"? Please tell me there's more to the story.

Cranky Curmudgeon

**Editor's note: See Steve's upcoming column in next week's newsletter for follow up to this question.**

------------------

RE: "Talk About Your Irony" (October 17, 2007)

This is his ALL TIME BEST...so good, in fact, that I could not stop chuckling and snorting and finally had to take a walk down the hall to stop disrupting my coworkers...and wouldn't you know the boss would walk by right in the middle of a belly laugh. Only my reputation as a valued employee saved me, which is ironic because I read "Kerrying On" faithfully to improve my performance in the workplace.

Phyllis J.

------------------

I'm an editor by profession, so I appreciated the comments on irony in the last Kerrying On. I agree that the use of the word and perhaps even appreciation of irony itself is in decline.

Just the same, when you publish a rant (OK, a gentle, lighthearted rant) about the misuse of words, you always make yourself a big target.

You wrote that you decided "try a new tact," if I remember right. I think you wanted to say "tack" in the sense of "course" or "direction" which originated in the nautical usage of turning a sailing vessel into the wind.

Of course, I could be wrong...

Thanks for your good work, and Kerry on.
Dion W.

Response from Kerry Patterson:

Thanks to all of you who caught this little error—how ironic! At least it's good to know someone's reading my column. We have updated the copy in the newsletter archives to use the correct term.

------------------

RE: "Confronting a Lie" (October 24, 2007)

Kerry,

I appreciate the approach you took in your answer to "Confronting a Lie."

I would like to offer one more piece of advice, however. Perhaps the parents of an adult twenty-eight-year-old should mind their own business and let him live life the way he chooses. Unless they paid for that degree, he owes them no explanation.

Thanks for all the great guidance you continue to provide.

Kind regards,
Denise S.

Back to top