Looking for a printer friendly version or having trouble reading this e-mail? View the online version.
To avoid having our newsletter blocked as spam, please add VitalSmarts@en25.com to your address book.

Please do not reply to this e-mail.

[Link: Newsletter Archive] [Image: Crucial Skills] [Image: Top Right Header]
April 1, 2009
Vol. 7 Issue 13
[Image: In This Issue]
[Image: Editors Note]


Crucial Conversations Training Coming to Minneapolis
May 19-20

Join us for Crucial Conversations two-day Training to learn a comprehensive strategy and key skills for reaching alignment and agreement. For trainer certification options, contact Annalee Strub at astrub@vitalsmarts.com

Register today to attend Crucial Conversations Training in Minneapolis, or visit our site to find a training course in a city near you.

[Image: Survey Results]

Long Distance Loathing

Thanks to all who participated in our recent reader poll about the benefits and challenges of working with team members or colleagues who are located in a different office, state, or country. Here are some of your top responses:

• Employees are 243% more likely to have teamwork problems with distant coworkers.
• Complaints about distant coworkers are 93% more common than complaints about employees who work in the same office.
• Problems with distant coworkers are significantly more difficult to solve and last significantly longer than problems with local coworkers.

[Image: Learn More]

[Image: Public Workshops]

Influencer Training
· 4/28-29 Washington, DC
· 5/12-13 Phoenix, AZ
»More

Crucial Conversations
· 4/14-15 Chicago, IL
· 4/21-22 Las Vegas, NV
»More

Crucial Confrontations
· 5/19-20 Las Vegas, NV
· 6/9-10 Washington, DC
»More

»Click here for International Public Events

[Image: Web Seminars]

Crucial Conversations
· Overview
- 4/7, 11:00-12:00 PM MT

Crucial Confrontations
· Overview
- 4/14, 11:00-12:00 PM MT

Influencer
· Overview
- 4/21, 11:00-12:00 PM MT

Register today for an event by clicking on one of the links above.

For questions, contact us toll free at 1-800-449-5989.

[Image: Contact Us]

Questions, feedback, or information you would like to see in the newsletter? E-mail us at editor@vitalsmarts.com.

Submit your Q&A question online to the authors of Crucial Conversations, Crucial Confrontations, and Influencer.

Newsletter Archive
Subscribe
My Account
Speakers
Training
Submission Guidelines

[Image: Tips For Getting the Results You Want]

"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me."
— Dudley Field Malone

[Image: Q & A]

Dealing with Negotiation Abuse

[Image: Kerry Patterson--Kerry Patterson is coauthor of the New York Times bestseller, Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High.
  [Image: Question] Dear Crucial Skills,

What if you’re in negotiations and you are doing your best to build safety with mutual respect and mutual purpose, but the other side is playing hard ball and making threats and accusations? They do not care about understanding others' needs. They care about creating conflict with absurdly unreasonable requests. Or, they do not want to make it safe to talk because not talking allows them to get what they want.

Frustrated Negotiator

  [Image: Answer] Dear Frustrated Negotiator,

When I field a question like this—where one party is describing the other party as not caring, unreasonable, threatening, and accusatory—I often wonder: How true is this? After all, this is just one side of the story. However, in this case I’ll take you at your word.

I spent two decades of my career consulting in organizations where every three years, management would enter formal negotiations with a union. It was there that I learned that it never took long before one or both sides started acting in exactly the way you described. The belligerent, disrespectful, and harsh tactics were not only off the charts by any standards, but also studied, coached, and practiced.

I learned a helpful method for stopping abuse in its tracks one day when working with a client who became upset at my partner and I for being late to a training session (5 minutes—he had given us wrong directions). Our client started screaming and cursing at us with a level of intensity I had never experienced before. I was shocked and speechless. My partner wasn’t. He stopped the harangue at about the fifth sentence and explained to our client that he would never work with someone who treated him this way. This caught our client by surprise.

My partner then stated that, based on the cursing and threats and abuse, he assumed the fellow didn’t want to work with us any longer either—because these were obviously the kind of things you said to someone you were firing—certainly not someone you wanted to collaborate with on a long-term project. My partner then picked up a phone and explained that he would now call the client’s boss and explain that he would love to continue working with their company, but his sensibilities prevented him from working with someone who cursed and threatened him. He then quoted exactly from what our client had said, taking care to match his tone and volume. Our client turned white as a sheet, apologized, and never abused us again—despite the fact that he routinely abused others.

This particular strategy falls under the category of “If you name the game, you don’t have to play it.” Here’s how it works. If you don’t already have ground rules about how you treat each other during negotiations, set them up as the negotiations unfold. Start, not by negotiating the contract, but by negotiating the negotiations. If you don’t clarify what you’ll allow and what you won’t, the forum can become enormously hostile, unprofessional, and completely out of the range of what is acceptable at work every day. Negotiations should model professional treatment, not abuse it at every turn.

This calls for clear descriptions of the behaviors that you believe are out of bounds. You suggested that people make accusations, threats, and unreasonable requests. I once worked in a healthcare system where certain professionals were accused of doing that very thing. A legal team sat down with those who felt victimized, created a long list of unacceptable, and very specific behaviors, and then had everyone sign a code of conduct that outlawed accusations, threats, and unreasonable requests. Nobody fought the list. How can you? Nobody reserved the right to use curse words—it’s sort of indefensible. Nobody held on to the idea that it was okay to shout threats at another person. These behaviors can’t stand the light of day.

If you can’t negotiate the negotiations in a formal way, do it on the fly. As my partner did, stop the other person in mid-abuse and point out the problem. Remain calm and professional, but simply don’t accept the mistreatment. Also, don’t use this tool willy-nilly. Choose your show-stopping behaviors carefully, and then take care to plant a flag every time the behavior is manifested. Gather strength in numbers. Sit down with your colleagues and jointly identify what is and isn’t acceptable and then support each other as you stand up for what is professional and acceptable. Nobody should have to go to work and worry about being verbally abused, threatened, mistreated, or otherwise put at risk. Negotiations should be no exception.

Kerry

[Image: VitalSmarts Logo]

To learn more about dealing with abusive or angry colleagues, view these newsletters:

"Workplace Violence" (January 5, 2005)
"Abusive Boss" (February 15, 2006)
"Anger Management Issues" (December 13, 2006)

Back to top

[Image: From the Road]

Choose Wisely—The Trainer's Dilemma

[Image: Steve Willis -- Steve Willis, vice president of professional services at VitalSmarts is one of the original Master Certified Trainers in both Crucial Conversations and Crucial Confrontations Training programs.

There are many reasons trainers fall behind schedule in a training. Sometimes participants ask questions that take a little longer to answer. Other times, the class schedule has been shortened to accommodate special meetings. Whether due to outside influences or personal mismanagement of the class, every trainer finds him or herself facing this dilemma: How am I ever going to cover everything and still end on time? (Note that one minute in trainer time is equal to at least three minutes standard time). And to make matters worse, how you handle this dilemma will determine the participants’ overall experience. So, what to do?

When you find yourself in a time crunch, rule number one is to never skip the practice. You can shorten discussions, you can omit stories, and you can even skip videos—but never skip the practice.

To be effective, make sure you understand what the main learning points of each training section are. Realize that videos, discussions, and other activities are included to help you make these points. At times, this will require you to make choices to not teach a supporting skill in order to give adequate practice time to foundational skills. In these moments, convey the main points and move participants as quickly as possible to practice. You’ll find that people learn more from doing than from listening.

While I hope you don’t find yourself in this situation often, when you do, choose wisely. Choose to teach and then practice the most important principles and skills.

If you're interested in bringing Steve or another of the VitalSmarts expert speakers to your organization, click here.

[Image: VitalSmarts Logo]

Back to top

 
Newsletter Archive | Subscribe | My Account | Speakers
Training | Submission Guidelines
 

To unsubscribe from the Crucial Skills Newsletter, click here
© 2009 VitalSmarts All rights reserved. Privacy Notice: We never release your e-mail address to third parties.