February 28, 2007
Vol. 5 Issue 9
IN THIS ISSUE
Public Displays of Insensitivity

Any of these scenarios sound familiar? The diner at the table next to you is talking loudly into his cell phone. Your boss is reading her e-mail—or maybe checking stock prices—instead of listening to your presentation. The guy sitting in front of you at the theater is sending text messages throughout the movie. Your brother-in-law forwards you chain e-mails every day. Your kids are mesmerized by their handheld video games—during dinner.

We're talking about how PDAs can create PDIs—in other words, how technologies like Personal Digital Assistants (cell phones, MP3 players, computers, digital cameras, etc.) can create Public Displays of Insensitivity.

We'd like to know your personal experiences with these acts of insensitivity. Please weigh in by taking our three-minute survey today. All who complete the survey will get access to a compelling audio lesson (MP3) from our popular Crucial Conversations Audio Companion.


Crucial Conversations
More

Crucial Confrontations
More


Crucial Conversations
  • 3/7, 11:00-12:15 PM MT Overview
  • 3/20, 11:00-12:00 PM MT Crucial Competencies for Healthcare Leaders
  • 4/18, 11:00-11:30 AM MT Flawless Execution for Project Management
  • 5/16, 11:00-11:30 AM MT Flawless Execution for IT
  • 6/20, 11:00-11:30 AM MT Flawless Execution for Six Sigma
  • Crucial Confrontations

  • 3/21, 11:00-12:15 PM MT Overview
  • More

    Register today for an event by clicking on one of the links above.

    For questions, contact us toll free at 1-800-449-5989.

    Questions, feedback, or information you would like to see in the newsletter? E-mail us at editor@vitalsmarts.com.

    Submit your Q&A question online to the authors of Crucial Conversations and Crucial Confrontations.

    About the Authors
    Submission Guidelines
    My Account
    Subscribe
    Newsletter Archive
    Tell a Friend
    "Since in order to speak, one must first listen,
    learn to speak by listening."
    – Mevlana Rumi

    Roommate Agreements


    About the Author


    Al Switzler is coauthor of the New York Times bestseller, Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High. more
    Dear Authors,

    My two sons share a four bedroom house with three other students at college. The three other students initially wanted other living accommodations for next year, while my sons wanted to stay. So my boys found two other students to share the house, and nobody wants to share a room. One of the original three roommates did not find other accommodations, and now wants to stay in the house next year. My oldest son is concerned about this crucial conversation—how to tell this student that his spot has been taken. How should he handle this delicate situation?

    Signed,
    Concerned Parent

    Dear Parent,

    There are a number of issues to address in this situation. I'd like to start by isolating a couple of issues and offer some advice.

    The first bit of counsel may be for future interactions. I'd like to address how to clarify things up front so these issues don't get so confusing and ugly. After your sons and the other students talked and made plans—after they engaged in dialogue and got to an agreement—they needed to "Move to Action." Specifically, they needed to document who would do what by when. The commitments and next steps would have been clear to both groups. Notice the word document. When issues are complicated, of long duration, or could be interpreted differently by different people (e.g., issues that involve money, contracts, leases, etc.), documenting is a very good idea. Why? Because memory is unsafe. A dull pencil, the old adage goes, is better than a sharp mind.

    If the previous agreement is clear, the issue is to get agreement around the new circumstances—which means holding a crucial conversation.

    Begin this conversation by making it safe. One of the best ways to do this is to start the discussion with your observations. Describe the Gap clearly, without adding judgments. It might sound something like this: "Last month we all agreed that the three of you would move out and that the two of us would find new roommates. We also decided that none of us wanted to share a room. We have found the new roommates. Now we hear that you want to stay in the house. That would mean sharing rooms. That doesn't match up with the plans that were made."

    Continue to make it safe by clarifying your intent and making sure the other person understands what you're trying to say, "I don't want to come across as not understanding the challenge of finding a new place; I just want to share how I see the agreement and make sure you understand our point of view. Do you see where I'm coming from?"

    I think it's probably a given that if the ex-roommate understands what had been agreed to, then the issue will become, "Yeah, but I tried and now things are different. Come on, give me a break here. We're friends." Now a new issue has been born, and finding a solution comes down to being creative with the options. Your sons need to decide what they want ultimately and then communicate that using their best crucial conversations skills. They could give in. They could say that he could stay two weeks while everyone helps him look for a new place. Or they could mention that the relationship is important but should not be tied to a new rooming agreement and that he can't stay.

    Regardless of how they decide to proceed, all this is new data for a new dialogue and safety is still an issue. Often when people see that you are trying to understand their new purpose and help them, and that you are being respectful, options emerge and relationships stay strong. There are no guarantees, but it is certainly the place to start.

    Best wishes,
    Al



    Back to Top


    RE: "Carpool Dilemma" (Feb. 7, 2007)

    Hello,

    I thought I would respond to the article in the newsletter about the carpool problem. I am surprised that Joseph is suggesting that the conversation is probably too difficult to be held as entrusting others with your children is pretty high stakes. I would approach the mother but in a light way share some of the comments the children often make when they are passengers and see how she responds. Hopefully she would make a comment that allows an opening for sharing concerns about safety when driving others' children around.

    I would be interested to hear how other people may deal with a similar situation.

    Best regards,
    Karen R.

    ------------------

    You gave excellent advice to the carpool mom. One little addition to it . . . there is another relationship involved in this scenario: her relationship with her children. They have told her repeatedly that they do not feel safe riding with the other woman. Whether the other driver is a safe driver or not, if mom continues to put them in a situation which they feel is unsafe, she is communicating to them either a distrust of their opinions or a lack of concern for their wellbeing. In either case, the damage done to her relationship with them is far more costly than it would be to find a different carpool person or not carpool at all.

    Nita Z.

    ------------------

    I cannot agree with your comment not to make suggestions.

    My suggestion is to have the concerned mother find a reason to share a ride with the other mother and see for herself how she drives, then have whatever conversation is appropriate.

    Greg B.

    ------------------

    Dear Joseph,

    Your response to the woman concerned about her neighbor's carpool driving was not up to the level of thoughtfulness and balance I've become accustomed to in the Crucial Skills column. Frankly, I think it was way out of line. You concluded that the writer's neighbor will neither hear concerns about her driving fairly nor be willing or able to change her driving habits.

    I thought Crucial Skills were about staying down at the level of data in order to maximize the possibilities for constructive change. Taking unilateral action based on silent judging is not the way.

    A better response would have been to recommend treating the issue with a focus on content, leaving open the opportunities for pattern and, if necessary, relationship conversations.

    Neither you nor the writer knows what behavior can change if the other person is not made aware of it. Please rethink your response and give the bad driver a break.

    Respectfully,
    Dave B.

    ------------------

    Response by Joseph Grenny

    Dear Dave,

    Your critique of my response couldn't sting worse. The reason is that my fundamental ethic about relationships is exactly in line with what you suggested. I believe we should not prejudge others. I believe we should not assume a conversation is unapproachable just because it's sensitive. And I believe we owe it to ourselves and others to engage with them in a healthy, respectful way. Finally, I couldn't agree more that my recommendation is inconsistent with that ethic. In writing my response to the Carpool Dilemma, I felt torn for exactly the reason you describe.

    Now let me be honest. As I first started to answer in my traditional mode, I found myself feeling hypocritical. As I wrote the idealistic response about what I think people should do, my conscience nagged at me because I realize that in this specific instance, it is not likely what I would do. As human beings we select our response to circumstances based on our estimation of likely outcomes. As I said in the column, if she is actually not driving badly, then there was never a need to hold the conversation. If she is, in fact, a dangerous driver, I place a low probability on a single conversation influencing such an ingrained and lifelong habit when I will have no chance to inspect her future behavior. Do I think I could have that conversation with her well? Yes. Absolutely. No question. Do I believe that if she's a dangerous driver this conversation will have a lasting effect? No. I don't. And that's what drove my far less than idealistic response.

    With that said, many readers agreed with your view. And I want to thank you for expressing it so directly, because it's exactly the ethic I want this column to represent.

    Warmly,
    Joseph

    ------------------

    RE: "The Reunion" (Feb. 14, 2007)

    I just wanted to pass on my real appreciation to Kerry for sharing this story with us in the latest newsletter. It was a truly touching piece of writing, and more than worth the time I invested in reading it.

    Thanks for giving us all such a space of connection!

    Cheers,
    Sam

    ------------------

    To Kerry Patterson et al...I really loved the Kerrying On article "The Reunion"!

    I really liked that Kerry focused on what he wanted to do—give gratitude for all the gifts he received as a kid but didn't realize they were gifts at the time. Kerry gave his "thank you" stories with no attachment of the ending of the story. I LOVE the fact that you included a letter to "Mary" with no knowledge of her receiving it. This is a great example of "doing our part" of crucial conversations without controlling the endings.

    Sarah A.

    ------------------

    Response by Kerry Patterson

    Dear readers,

    In the last Kerrying On I wrote a short story about attending my forty-year high-school reunion. I told of how I had decided to thank dear friends who I hadn't seen in decades for their kind help and support during my adolescent years. I was particularly interested in expressing my appreciation to a terrific young woman named Mary who had been kind to me at a time when it would have been easy to dismiss me or even treat me with disdain. But she had always treated me with respect.

    I was disappointed to learn that Mary hadn't come to the reunion, and then to hear the changed circumstances of her life. In the end I did what I had set out to do—I wrote her a letter thanking her for her kindness. That had been my point. It was Valentine's Day when I wrote of Mary, and I was suggesting that notes of respect and admiration make for a wonderful Valentine.

    Many of you wrote to ask what happened next. Alas, Mary never responded. I may never learn more about this fine person. But I do know this: Her gentle kindness will be forever appreciated.

    Kerry


    Back to Top